Dose uncertainty#
1. Polynomial function#
1.1 Film response#
Net optical density represents the film response [1] as:
where \(I_0\) and \(I\) are the reading for the unexposed and exposed film piece, respectively.
Using error propagation, the associated standard deviation is given by [2,3]:
1.2 Calibration#
Film response to dose relationship can be fitted to a power function of the form: $\( D = a\cdot netOD + b\cdot (netOD)^n \)$
where a, b, and n are fitting parameters and D is the measured dose in Gy.
Using propagation error analysis [3], the dose uncertainty is given by:
where \(SD_{exp}\) is the experimental uncertainty associated with the film irradiation and scanning procedures [2]. \(SD_{fit}\) represents the fitting uncertainty.
where \(SD_a\) and \(SD_b\) are the fitting parameter uncertainties.
2. Rational function#
2.1 Film response#
The normalized pixel value represents the film response to dose [1], \(x\) as: $\(x = \frac{I}{I_0}\)\( where \)I\( and \)I_0$ are the reading for the exposed and unexposed film, respectively. Using error propagation expression and ignoring cross-correlation, the associated standar deviation for film response is given by:
where \(SD(I)\) and \(SD(I_0)\) are the associated standard deviations for \(I\) and \(I_0\), respectively.
2.2 Calibration#
The response to dose relationship is constructed by plotting the dose \(D\), as a function of film response \(x\):
Using propagation error analysis [3], the dose uncertainty is given by:
where \(SD_{exp}\) is the experimental uncertainty associated with the film irradiation and scanning procedures [2]. \(SD_{fit}\) represents the fitting uncertainty.
where \(SD_a\) and \(SD_b\) are the fitting parameter uncertainties.
Bibliography#
[1] Azam Niroomand-Rad, et al, Report of AAPM Task Group 235 Radiochromic Film Dosimetry: An Update to TG-55, Medical physics, 47(12), (2020), 5986-6025.
[2] L.A. Olivares-J., Distribución de dosis en radioterapia de intensidad modulada usando películas de tinte radiocrómico. Tesis de maestría, UNAM, (2019).
[3] E.Y. León Marroquin, et al, Evaluation of the uncertainty in an EBT3 film dosimetry system utilizing net optical density, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys., 17 (2016), pp. 466-481.
[4] Devic S, Seuntjens J, Hegyi G, et al. Dosimetric properties of improved GafChromic films for seven different digitizers. Med Phys. (2004);31(9):2392–401.